<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/</link>
	<description>Not all that useful for telling time, no...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:41:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HM</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>HM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1237#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Yeah! I want more, but all good things have to end...? I actually really liked the last sentence, kind of gave me goosebumps. Well done, my friend, well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah! I want more, but all good things have to end&#8230;? I actually really liked the last sentence, kind of gave me goosebumps. Well done, my friend, well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1237#comment-366</guid>
		<description>SUCCESS
P1: I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration to say that the halogens were “killed”. Then you’ve got a fragment. Third sentence needs a bit more finessing. At “David,” we should probably be into a new paragraph. We’re not British: “smelled”. And write out “they had”.
P2: “Revealed”. Otherwise, nice paragraph. Allows some tension to build again.
P4: Ran through? “His” before “gun drawn” unnecessary. 
P5: Dangling particle in the second sentence, unless David is the one with all fours hunched. Yay!! No spoon necessary!!
P6: Interesting. But what did it feel like when the creature struck him? Where did it strike? Why is he sure that it’s the creature that struck him?
P7: Here’s some of the missing info, but it works better if introduced before he starts thinking about how the creature never moved. Lots of “turning” going on here.
P8: “Struck”. If the blood’s unnoticed, why is he dabbing it? Nice scene though.
P9: Fragment. 
P10: “Pinning”.
P11: Hooray!!
P12: Eric can move? Good on him.
P13: Either use all dashes or all ellipses in this sentence; not both.
P15: Ditto.
P16: “Waved”. 
P19: “A” not “the” baseball bat. Kind of strange finishing sentence.
P20: He leveled the bat with his waist? Somehow, I don’t think so. More likely he lowered the bat to waist level. 
P26: But he wasn’t out, was he?
P27: Oh. 
P29: Eric can walk already? No seriously, after all of that, all he has to show for it is a broken arm?
P31: Sentence doesn’t flow. Subject confusion.
P33: Sure it’s not…
P35: Really funky punctuation here.
P36: Nice impressions. Works well.
P43: His hand? Ouch. Maybe a fist or knuckles. Or a palm, of flats of fingers if it’s a slap.
P51: No kidding.
P52: Check your punctuation on the second sentence. 
P55: How about: “Uncharacteristic emotion poured across his face.”?
P58: The “ings” are back.
P60: Nice image.
P68: Watch dialogue punctuation again. You did it a few paragraphs earlier too.
P72: “ohing”? “ooing”
P80: Check punctuation.
P86: I’m having trouble understanding the described action here.
P89: Is this really a question? And why a sad laugh?
P91: “I’m”. 
P93: “eaten”. 
P99: Espresso my thanks? Lol.

P1: Lower case on second “detective”. 
P2: Yup. We’re all really sad about that. Lowercase “earthquake”, by the way.
P4: “and”. “completed” instead of “made it through”? 
P6: “shown”.
P9: Hooray again!! I’d have been very sad if you killed off Eric twice.
P12-13: Nifty bit of writing here. 
P15: So she’s the third who understands? I want to hear her story. But then, you already know I’m a Ford fan. 
P16: Hate to say it, but the ending comes across as cliché. After the powerful bit before that, it needs more thought.

Final thoughts:
-You’re back to excessive ing-ing in places, so watch that. Much better with the “it” thing—I didn’t need my spoon once! Better with punctuating dialogue too; only a couple of problem spots. 
-As always, I’d like to see more description in subsequent drafts: the scene, the people and their reactions, more time taken on action, details worked in. Still, pretty darn good as a first draft.
-Eric lives! See? Denial sometimes pays off.
-I really liked the flashbacks inserted throughout, and how they flowed like dialogue. Consider putting them in italics, perhaps, to offset them more. 
-Really nice scene there at the end with D. Ford. I like how you leave the action dangling with David/Eric, and then BAM! Here we are in a totally different scene with a totally different feel. It puts us off-balance, keeps the intrigue up, and then wraps things up in well-inserted explanation. The only problem is the last sentence. And for me, that’s often the single hardest sentence to write in the entire project. Good luck with that, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUCCESS<br />
P1: I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration to say that the halogens were “killed”. Then you’ve got a fragment. Third sentence needs a bit more finessing. At “David,” we should probably be into a new paragraph. We’re not British: “smelled”. And write out “they had”.<br />
P2: “Revealed”. Otherwise, nice paragraph. Allows some tension to build again.<br />
P4: Ran through? “His” before “gun drawn” unnecessary.<br />
P5: Dangling particle in the second sentence, unless David is the one with all fours hunched. Yay!! No spoon necessary!!<br />
P6: Interesting. But what did it feel like when the creature struck him? Where did it strike? Why is he sure that it’s the creature that struck him?<br />
P7: Here’s some of the missing info, but it works better if introduced before he starts thinking about how the creature never moved. Lots of “turning” going on here.<br />
P8: “Struck”. If the blood’s unnoticed, why is he dabbing it? Nice scene though.<br />
P9: Fragment.<br />
P10: “Pinning”.<br />
P11: Hooray!!<br />
P12: Eric can move? Good on him.<br />
P13: Either use all dashes or all ellipses in this sentence; not both.<br />
P15: Ditto.<br />
P16: “Waved”.<br />
P19: “A” not “the” baseball bat. Kind of strange finishing sentence.<br />
P20: He leveled the bat with his waist? Somehow, I don’t think so. More likely he lowered the bat to waist level.<br />
P26: But he wasn’t out, was he?<br />
P27: Oh.<br />
P29: Eric can walk already? No seriously, after all of that, all he has to show for it is a broken arm?<br />
P31: Sentence doesn’t flow. Subject confusion.<br />
P33: Sure it’s not…<br />
P35: Really funky punctuation here.<br />
P36: Nice impressions. Works well.<br />
P43: His hand? Ouch. Maybe a fist or knuckles. Or a palm, of flats of fingers if it’s a slap.<br />
P51: No kidding.<br />
P52: Check your punctuation on the second sentence.<br />
P55: How about: “Uncharacteristic emotion poured across his face.”?<br />
P58: The “ings” are back.<br />
P60: Nice image.<br />
P68: Watch dialogue punctuation again. You did it a few paragraphs earlier too.<br />
P72: “ohing”? “ooing”<br />
P80: Check punctuation.<br />
P86: I’m having trouble understanding the described action here.<br />
P89: Is this really a question? And why a sad laugh?<br />
P91: “I’m”.<br />
P93: “eaten”.<br />
P99: Espresso my thanks? Lol.</p>
<p>P1: Lower case on second “detective”.<br />
P2: Yup. We’re all really sad about that. Lowercase “earthquake”, by the way.<br />
P4: “and”. “completed” instead of “made it through”?<br />
P6: “shown”.<br />
P9: Hooray again!! I’d have been very sad if you killed off Eric twice.<br />
P12-13: Nifty bit of writing here.<br />
P15: So she’s the third who understands? I want to hear her story. But then, you already know I’m a Ford fan.<br />
P16: Hate to say it, but the ending comes across as cliché. After the powerful bit before that, it needs more thought.</p>
<p>Final thoughts:<br />
-You’re back to excessive ing-ing in places, so watch that. Much better with the “it” thing—I didn’t need my spoon once! Better with punctuating dialogue too; only a couple of problem spots.<br />
-As always, I’d like to see more description in subsequent drafts: the scene, the people and their reactions, more time taken on action, details worked in. Still, pretty darn good as a first draft.<br />
-Eric lives! See? Denial sometimes pays off.<br />
-I really liked the flashbacks inserted throughout, and how they flowed like dialogue. Consider putting them in italics, perhaps, to offset them more.<br />
-Really nice scene there at the end with D. Ford. I like how you leave the action dangling with David/Eric, and then BAM! Here we are in a totally different scene with a totally different feel. It puts us off-balance, keeps the intrigue up, and then wraps things up in well-inserted explanation. The only problem is the last sentence. And for me, that’s often the single hardest sentence to write in the entire project. Good luck with that, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

