<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 25 Hour Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.25hourwatch.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com</link>
	<description>Not all that useful for telling time, no...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scarab Poem by Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/21/scarab-poem/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/21/scarab-poem/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>I’ll be honest; I find the overall form of this poem too disjointed for my liking. I prefer the line-phrase style used in some of your previously posted work. You’ll have guessed by now that I’m a fan of poetic forms that possess discernable patterns, and the seemingly random way “Scarab’s” stanzas are divided confounds me. This, of course, is personal preference.

Additionally, I’d like to see reworking of the lines/phrases/images. Much of the poem just doesn’t have a finished feel to it yet. I do particularly like the line “prayers balanced against a feather”, and the important integration of rebirth provides a cyclical end to a poem that begins with “creation”. A very cool concept the whole way through, and I’d love to see a more developed version, regardless of formal style ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll be honest; I find the overall form of this poem too disjointed for my liking. I prefer the line-phrase style used in some of your previously posted work. You’ll have guessed by now that I’m a fan of poetic forms that possess discernable patterns, and the seemingly random way “Scarab’s” stanzas are divided confounds me. This, of course, is personal preference.</p>
<p>Additionally, I’d like to see reworking of the lines/phrases/images. Much of the poem just doesn’t have a finished feel to it yet. I do particularly like the line “prayers balanced against a feather”, and the important integration of rebirth provides a cyclical end to a poem that begins with “creation”. A very cool concept the whole way through, and I’d love to see a more developed version, regardless of formal style <img src='http://www.25hourwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflection on San Rafael by Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/21/reflection-on-san-rafael/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/21/reflection-on-san-rafael/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Very nice piece here, Rikki Jean. You explore a sublime landscape, touching on remnants of its ancient past, and end with an emotional link that is almost tangible. 

A couple of suggestions: I think the feel and form of the stanzas could be improved if you removed much (or all) of the punctuation, particularly commas and periods. There isn’t consistency with punctuation within the poem anyway, and the parts without work better for me. Additionally, consider removing the “we” in that second to last stanza (so it would read: “Open palms/touch cool red rock”). The blatant introduction of an active participant so late in the poem pulled me from the stanza. Subtlety would keep the mystic feel more intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice piece here, Rikki Jean. You explore a sublime landscape, touching on remnants of its ancient past, and end with an emotional link that is almost tangible. </p>
<p>A couple of suggestions: I think the feel and form of the stanzas could be improved if you removed much (or all) of the punctuation, particularly commas and periods. There isn’t consistency with punctuation within the poem anyway, and the parts without work better for me. Additionally, consider removing the “we” in that second to last stanza (so it would read: “Open palms/touch cool red rock”). The blatant introduction of an active participant so late in the poem pulled me from the stanza. Subtlety would keep the mystic feel more intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on sightsiteciteDENVERwhatifound2shoot by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/22/sightsitecitedenverwhatifound2shoot/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1228#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Great shots.  I like the Broadway and Colfax one a lot, how you got the birds on the lamp framed.  Great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shots.  I like the Broadway and Colfax one a lot, how you got the birds on the lamp framed.  Great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Nightmares&#8221; by 25 Hour Watch - &#8220;Role&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/03/13/nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>25 Hour Watch - &#8220;Role&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=926#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] Pt. 2: &#8220;Nightmares&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pt. 2: &#8220;Nightmares&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AFTER by Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/12/after/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1245#comment-383</guid>
		<description>P1: I think you mean “right leg” and this initial description of the jolt exiting his shoulder is a little confusing. I’m not sure how a jolt to the leg would do that. Verb “seated” feels unnecessary. He flickered? I find that highly unlikely. His eyes, on the other hand… Is Dima his nickname? Wrong form of “its”, misused semicolon. I like the insect metaphor. Overuse of commas in the last sentence. In this section, I’d recommend simplifying the description a little more. As written, parts are a little difficult to understand on the first read through.
P2: “until they cracked”. Again, the description is a bit confusing as written. I’m not sure exactly what I should be picturing. And is he really in awe? Astonishment might be a more accurate word.
P3: I don’t get the impression that hysteria is “setting off”. It seems like it’s more in progress than just beginning. Could be wrong though. Too many commas in first sentence. Semicolon should be period.
P4: Much better description here. I can totally picture the papers fluttering through the ex-wall. “Sooner” implies time, so you should probably use a distance word instead. Period instead of semicolon. “He squinted and he went blank”? Not sure what this means. Writing gets a little confusing in the latter third of the paragraph, particularly his thought search. I do like the repetition of the ambulance lights.
P5: Punctuation note: there is only an apostrophe in “it’s” for a contraction of “it is”. When showing possession, no apostrophe: “its”. Comma, not semicolon in both instances. Description is fine through here, much easier to follow.
P6: Hoping for a clue to what? Comma, not semicolon. No need for “seemingly”. Too many commas in last sentence. 
P7: Period, not semicolon. No need for “with blood”. Confusing way to word that last sentence. Simplify. Also, I’m struggling to understand why this discovery’s so important, as the first sentence makes it seem.
P8: Too many buts. Don’t be afraid to divide some of those sentences into two. It’ll help give the wording a more panicked feel too. No need for that semicolon either. Who is this guy anyway? Although, that’s probably in the next part, lol.

Final Comments:
-This scene is intriguing, for sure. I’m intensely curious about what happened to bring about this destruction in the first place, who Dmitry is, and how he fits into the events. 
-You switch back between “Dmitry” and “Dima” too often through the middle. I’d stick with the nickname after the initial intro until you hit with the full name in your last sentence. 
-You sometimes have a tendency to overwrite the descriptions, which makes comprehension more difficult for your reader. Don’t be afraid to start simple and straightforward, and keep an eye on those commas. Additionally, be careful of when and how you use semicolons. 
-Take a little more time in your opening description to orient the reader. Make us picture the scene, especially since there isn’t much in the way of action taking place. I think this will make your opening much more powerful. 
-Excellent start! Looking forward to seeing where this goes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P1: I think you mean “right leg” and this initial description of the jolt exiting his shoulder is a little confusing. I’m not sure how a jolt to the leg would do that. Verb “seated” feels unnecessary. He flickered? I find that highly unlikely. His eyes, on the other hand… Is Dima his nickname? Wrong form of “its”, misused semicolon. I like the insect metaphor. Overuse of commas in the last sentence. In this section, I’d recommend simplifying the description a little more. As written, parts are a little difficult to understand on the first read through.<br />
P2: “until they cracked”. Again, the description is a bit confusing as written. I’m not sure exactly what I should be picturing. And is he really in awe? Astonishment might be a more accurate word.<br />
P3: I don’t get the impression that hysteria is “setting off”. It seems like it’s more in progress than just beginning. Could be wrong though. Too many commas in first sentence. Semicolon should be period.<br />
P4: Much better description here. I can totally picture the papers fluttering through the ex-wall. “Sooner” implies time, so you should probably use a distance word instead. Period instead of semicolon. “He squinted and he went blank”? Not sure what this means. Writing gets a little confusing in the latter third of the paragraph, particularly his thought search. I do like the repetition of the ambulance lights.<br />
P5: Punctuation note: there is only an apostrophe in “it’s” for a contraction of “it is”. When showing possession, no apostrophe: “its”. Comma, not semicolon in both instances. Description is fine through here, much easier to follow.<br />
P6: Hoping for a clue to what? Comma, not semicolon. No need for “seemingly”. Too many commas in last sentence.<br />
P7: Period, not semicolon. No need for “with blood”. Confusing way to word that last sentence. Simplify. Also, I’m struggling to understand why this discovery’s so important, as the first sentence makes it seem.<br />
P8: Too many buts. Don’t be afraid to divide some of those sentences into two. It’ll help give the wording a more panicked feel too. No need for that semicolon either. Who is this guy anyway? Although, that’s probably in the next part, lol.</p>
<p>Final Comments:<br />
-This scene is intriguing, for sure. I’m intensely curious about what happened to bring about this destruction in the first place, who Dmitry is, and how he fits into the events.<br />
-You switch back between “Dmitry” and “Dima” too often through the middle. I’d stick with the nickname after the initial intro until you hit with the full name in your last sentence.<br />
-You sometimes have a tendency to overwrite the descriptions, which makes comprehension more difficult for your reader. Don’t be afraid to start simple and straightforward, and keep an eye on those commas. Additionally, be careful of when and how you use semicolons.<br />
-Take a little more time in your opening description to orient the reader. Make us picture the scene, especially since there isn’t much in the way of action taking place. I think this will make your opening much more powerful.<br />
-Excellent start! Looking forward to seeing where this goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ode to Cerulean by Joye Lisk</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/06/04/ode-to-cerulean/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Joye Lisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1243#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Wonderful.....captured the sky and sea and delphiniums in one poem.   May favorite is cosmic cobalt of course!  Hugs!  Auntie Joye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful&#8230;..captured the sky and sea and delphiniums in one poem.   May favorite is cosmic cobalt of course!  Hugs!  Auntie Joye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Record by HM</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>HM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1237#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Yeah! I want more, but all good things have to end...? I actually really liked the last sentence, kind of gave me goosebumps. Well done, my friend, well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah! I want more, but all good things have to end&#8230;? I actually really liked the last sentence, kind of gave me goosebumps. Well done, my friend, well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Record by Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/27/the-record/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1237#comment-366</guid>
		<description>SUCCESS
P1: I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration to say that the halogens were “killed”. Then you’ve got a fragment. Third sentence needs a bit more finessing. At “David,” we should probably be into a new paragraph. We’re not British: “smelled”. And write out “they had”.
P2: “Revealed”. Otherwise, nice paragraph. Allows some tension to build again.
P4: Ran through? “His” before “gun drawn” unnecessary. 
P5: Dangling particle in the second sentence, unless David is the one with all fours hunched. Yay!! No spoon necessary!!
P6: Interesting. But what did it feel like when the creature struck him? Where did it strike? Why is he sure that it’s the creature that struck him?
P7: Here’s some of the missing info, but it works better if introduced before he starts thinking about how the creature never moved. Lots of “turning” going on here.
P8: “Struck”. If the blood’s unnoticed, why is he dabbing it? Nice scene though.
P9: Fragment. 
P10: “Pinning”.
P11: Hooray!!
P12: Eric can move? Good on him.
P13: Either use all dashes or all ellipses in this sentence; not both.
P15: Ditto.
P16: “Waved”. 
P19: “A” not “the” baseball bat. Kind of strange finishing sentence.
P20: He leveled the bat with his waist? Somehow, I don’t think so. More likely he lowered the bat to waist level. 
P26: But he wasn’t out, was he?
P27: Oh. 
P29: Eric can walk already? No seriously, after all of that, all he has to show for it is a broken arm?
P31: Sentence doesn’t flow. Subject confusion.
P33: Sure it’s not…
P35: Really funky punctuation here.
P36: Nice impressions. Works well.
P43: His hand? Ouch. Maybe a fist or knuckles. Or a palm, of flats of fingers if it’s a slap.
P51: No kidding.
P52: Check your punctuation on the second sentence. 
P55: How about: “Uncharacteristic emotion poured across his face.”?
P58: The “ings” are back.
P60: Nice image.
P68: Watch dialogue punctuation again. You did it a few paragraphs earlier too.
P72: “ohing”? “ooing”
P80: Check punctuation.
P86: I’m having trouble understanding the described action here.
P89: Is this really a question? And why a sad laugh?
P91: “I’m”. 
P93: “eaten”. 
P99: Espresso my thanks? Lol.

P1: Lower case on second “detective”. 
P2: Yup. We’re all really sad about that. Lowercase “earthquake”, by the way.
P4: “and”. “completed” instead of “made it through”? 
P6: “shown”.
P9: Hooray again!! I’d have been very sad if you killed off Eric twice.
P12-13: Nifty bit of writing here. 
P15: So she’s the third who understands? I want to hear her story. But then, you already know I’m a Ford fan. 
P16: Hate to say it, but the ending comes across as cliché. After the powerful bit before that, it needs more thought.

Final thoughts:
-You’re back to excessive ing-ing in places, so watch that. Much better with the “it” thing—I didn’t need my spoon once! Better with punctuating dialogue too; only a couple of problem spots. 
-As always, I’d like to see more description in subsequent drafts: the scene, the people and their reactions, more time taken on action, details worked in. Still, pretty darn good as a first draft.
-Eric lives! See? Denial sometimes pays off.
-I really liked the flashbacks inserted throughout, and how they flowed like dialogue. Consider putting them in italics, perhaps, to offset them more. 
-Really nice scene there at the end with D. Ford. I like how you leave the action dangling with David/Eric, and then BAM! Here we are in a totally different scene with a totally different feel. It puts us off-balance, keeps the intrigue up, and then wraps things up in well-inserted explanation. The only problem is the last sentence. And for me, that’s often the single hardest sentence to write in the entire project. Good luck with that, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUCCESS<br />
P1: I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration to say that the halogens were “killed”. Then you’ve got a fragment. Third sentence needs a bit more finessing. At “David,” we should probably be into a new paragraph. We’re not British: “smelled”. And write out “they had”.<br />
P2: “Revealed”. Otherwise, nice paragraph. Allows some tension to build again.<br />
P4: Ran through? “His” before “gun drawn” unnecessary.<br />
P5: Dangling particle in the second sentence, unless David is the one with all fours hunched. Yay!! No spoon necessary!!<br />
P6: Interesting. But what did it feel like when the creature struck him? Where did it strike? Why is he sure that it’s the creature that struck him?<br />
P7: Here’s some of the missing info, but it works better if introduced before he starts thinking about how the creature never moved. Lots of “turning” going on here.<br />
P8: “Struck”. If the blood’s unnoticed, why is he dabbing it? Nice scene though.<br />
P9: Fragment.<br />
P10: “Pinning”.<br />
P11: Hooray!!<br />
P12: Eric can move? Good on him.<br />
P13: Either use all dashes or all ellipses in this sentence; not both.<br />
P15: Ditto.<br />
P16: “Waved”.<br />
P19: “A” not “the” baseball bat. Kind of strange finishing sentence.<br />
P20: He leveled the bat with his waist? Somehow, I don’t think so. More likely he lowered the bat to waist level.<br />
P26: But he wasn’t out, was he?<br />
P27: Oh.<br />
P29: Eric can walk already? No seriously, after all of that, all he has to show for it is a broken arm?<br />
P31: Sentence doesn’t flow. Subject confusion.<br />
P33: Sure it’s not…<br />
P35: Really funky punctuation here.<br />
P36: Nice impressions. Works well.<br />
P43: His hand? Ouch. Maybe a fist or knuckles. Or a palm, of flats of fingers if it’s a slap.<br />
P51: No kidding.<br />
P52: Check your punctuation on the second sentence.<br />
P55: How about: “Uncharacteristic emotion poured across his face.”?<br />
P58: The “ings” are back.<br />
P60: Nice image.<br />
P68: Watch dialogue punctuation again. You did it a few paragraphs earlier too.<br />
P72: “ohing”? “ooing”<br />
P80: Check punctuation.<br />
P86: I’m having trouble understanding the described action here.<br />
P89: Is this really a question? And why a sad laugh?<br />
P91: “I’m”.<br />
P93: “eaten”.<br />
P99: Espresso my thanks? Lol.</p>
<p>P1: Lower case on second “detective”.<br />
P2: Yup. We’re all really sad about that. Lowercase “earthquake”, by the way.<br />
P4: “and”. “completed” instead of “made it through”?<br />
P6: “shown”.<br />
P9: Hooray again!! I’d have been very sad if you killed off Eric twice.<br />
P12-13: Nifty bit of writing here.<br />
P15: So she’s the third who understands? I want to hear her story. But then, you already know I’m a Ford fan.<br />
P16: Hate to say it, but the ending comes across as cliché. After the powerful bit before that, it needs more thought.</p>
<p>Final thoughts:<br />
-You’re back to excessive ing-ing in places, so watch that. Much better with the “it” thing—I didn’t need my spoon once! Better with punctuating dialogue too; only a couple of problem spots.<br />
-As always, I’d like to see more description in subsequent drafts: the scene, the people and their reactions, more time taken on action, details worked in. Still, pretty darn good as a first draft.<br />
-Eric lives! See? Denial sometimes pays off.<br />
-I really liked the flashbacks inserted throughout, and how they flowed like dialogue. Consider putting them in italics, perhaps, to offset them more.<br />
-Really nice scene there at the end with D. Ford. I like how you leave the action dangling with David/Eric, and then BAM! Here we are in a totally different scene with a totally different feel. It puts us off-balance, keeps the intrigue up, and then wraps things up in well-inserted explanation. The only problem is the last sentence. And for me, that’s often the single hardest sentence to write in the entire project. Good luck with that, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fever by 25 Hour Watch - The Record</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/19/fever/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>25 Hour Watch - The Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 08:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1215#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] Ch. 6 &#8211; Fever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ch. 6 &#8211; Fever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fever by Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.25hourwatch.com/2010/05/19/fever/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 05:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.25hourwatch.com/?p=1215#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Haha.  Catawampus...Dweedle.  :)

Good stuff here.  The pace was good and I could sense the urgency of the moment throughout.  I can&#039;t wait for the next and &quot;final&quot; part. 

Just to let u know, as a fan, I&#039;m starting the the demand for more after the series &quot;ends&quot;, ...Now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha.  Catawampus&#8230;Dweedle.  <img src='http://www.25hourwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Good stuff here.  The pace was good and I could sense the urgency of the moment throughout.  I can&#8217;t wait for the next and &#8220;final&#8221; part. </p>
<p>Just to let u know, as a fan, I&#8217;m starting the the demand for more after the series &#8220;ends&#8221;, &#8230;Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
